A mirror of https://github.com/rmyorston/busybox-w32.git https://git.lua4.win/busybox-w32/atom?h=1_00 2004-10-08T07:46:08+00:00 2004-10-08T07:46:08+00:00 Eric Andersen andersen@codepoet.org 2004-10-08T07:46:08+00:00 urn:sha1:7daa076d3e24e84ce1f4e9b6133783816575c4c8 Hi! I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6. That is, one runs command like 'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options' and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists. I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing is needed at all to whether it coded properly. 'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that. One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first. egor 2004-03-15T08:29:22+00:00 Eric Andersen andersen@codepoet.org 2004-03-15T08:29:22+00:00 urn:sha1:c7bda1ce659294d6e22c06e087f6f265983c7578 2003-01-11T18:07:38+00:00 Eric Andersen andersen@codepoet.org 2003-01-11T18:07:38+00:00 urn:sha1:575c78274a7458cc9459c6e07c5ff33a103c3f3c 2002-12-13T22:53:28+00:00 Eric Andersen andersen@codepoet.org 2002-12-13T22:53:28+00:00 urn:sha1:068b6b07ff5dc2dbb513f444cb094197f28e64c5 -Erik 2002-12-05T08:41:41+00:00 Eric Andersen andersen@codepoet.org 2002-12-05T08:41:41+00:00 urn:sha1:c9f20d9fb93c6c316518483fd103f3afab5cf1af modified Kbuild system I put into uClibc. With this, there should be no more need to modify Rules.mak since I've moved all the interesting options into the config system. I think I've got everything updated, but you never know, I may have made some mistakes, so watch closely. -Erik