Place a temporary bandaid on the ls/du/df human-readable issue. This method is

not going to scale up as well as I would like, and Matt Kraai and I have
discussed a better long term solution.  But for now this will at least make all
the human-readable apps give correct answers.

Please test the human readable/non-human readable options on your systems!!!
 -Erik

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/coreutils/ls.c b/coreutils/ls.c
index 86691fdaf..49470e9f7 100644
--- a/coreutils/ls.c
+++ b/coreutils/ls.c
@@ -648,15 +648,18 @@ static int list_single(struct dnode *dn)
                                         printf("%4d, %3d ", (int)MAJOR(dn->dstat.st_rdev), (int)MINOR(dn->dstat.st_rdev));
                                 } else {
 #ifdef BB_FEATURE_HUMAN_READABLE
-                                        fprintf(stdout, "%9s ", make_human_readable_str(dn->dstat.st_size>>10,
-                                                                (ls_disp_hr==TRUE)? 0: 1));
-#else
+                                        if (ls_disp_hr==TRUE) {
+                                                fprintf(stdout, "%9s ", make_human_readable_str(
+                                                                        dn->dstat.st_size>>10, 0));
+                                        } else 
+#endif  
+                                        {
 #if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64
-                                        printf("%9lld ", dn->dstat.st_size);
+                                                printf("%9lld ", dn->dstat.st_size);
 #else
-                                        printf("%9ld ", dn->dstat.st_size);
-#endif
+                                                printf("%9ld ", dn->dstat.st_size);
 #endif
+                                        }
                                 }
                                 column += 10;
                                 break;