From ffa28d1b468a9318affcbdc27277f43d10b00f24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:07:40 +0000
Subject: fixes from Selwyn Tang

---
 docs/busybox.net/license.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/busybox.net/license.html b/docs/busybox.net/license.html
index f8e0189fc..ff1ba61f3 100644
--- a/docs/busybox.net/license.html
+++ b/docs/busybox.net/license.html
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ your licensing obligations.
 
 If you distribute a product, it should either be accompanied by
 <b>full source for all GPL'd products</b> (including BusyBox)
-and/or a <b>written offer</b> to supply the source source for all
+and/or a <b>written offer</b> to supply the source for all
 GPL'd products for the cost of shipping and handling.  The source
 has to be in its preferred machine readable form, so you cannot
 encrypt or obfuscate it.  You are not required to provide full
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ firmware updates of their right to obtain source.
 Additionally, some people have the mistaken understanding that if
 they use unmodified GPL'd source code, they do not need to
 distribute anything.  This belief is not correct, and is not
-supported by the text of the 
+supported by the 
 <a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html">text of GPL</a>.
 Please do re-read it, and you
 will find there is no such provision.  If you distribute any GPL'd
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-55-g6feb