From 5dadd497ffd9835a2860cf89ad781d1b513803dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denys Vlasenko Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 16:20:05 +0200 Subject: runsv: robustify signal handling - SIGTERM to child between vfork and exec could mess things up While at it, rename bb_signals_recursive_norestart() to bb_signals_norestart(): "recursive" was implying we are setting SA_NODEFER allowing signal handler to be entered recursively, but we do not do that. function old new delta bb_signals_norestart - 70 +70 startservice 380 394 +14 bb_signals_recursive_norestart 70 - -70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 84/-70) Total: 14 bytes Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko --- libbb/signals.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'libbb') diff --git a/libbb/signals.c b/libbb/signals.c index d3d84ef6a..0bebc847d 100644 --- a/libbb/signals.c +++ b/libbb/signals.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ void FAST_FUNC bb_signals(int sigs, void (*f)(int)) } } -void FAST_FUNC bb_signals_recursive_norestart(int sigs, void (*f)(int)) +void FAST_FUNC bb_signals_norestart(int sigs, void (*f)(int)) { int sig_no = 0; int bit = 1; -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g6feb