<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>openbsd/src/lib/libcrypto/crypto/arch/amd64/Makefile.inc, branch OPENBSD_5_7_BASE</title>
<subtitle>A mirror of https://github.com/libressl/openbsd.git
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/atom?h=OPENBSD_5_7_BASE</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/atom?h=OPENBSD_5_7_BASE'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/'/>
<updated>2014-11-17T20:31:22+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>Add the Cammelia cipher to libcrypto.</title>
<updated>2014-11-17T20:31:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>miod</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2014-11-17T20:31:22+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=1327462df8cb4ae2dc056e0de53b4b4dc50f50fa'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1327462df8cb4ae2dc056e0de53b4b4dc50f50fa</id>
<content type='text'>
There used to be a strong reluctance to provide this cipher in LibreSSL in the
past, because the licence terms under which Cammelia was released by NTT were
free-but-not-in-the-corners, by restricting the right to modify the source
code, as well retaining the right to enforce their patents against anyone
in the future.

However, as stated in http://www.ntt.co.jp/news/news06e/0604/060413a.html ,
NTT changed its mind and made this code truly free. We only wish there had
been more visibility of this, for we could have had enabled Cammelia
earlier (-:

Licence change noticed by deraadt@. General agreement from the usual LibreSSL
suspects.

Crank libcrypto.so minor version due to the added symbols.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Guard RSA / RC4-5 ASM when NO_ASM is not defined</title>
<updated>2014-08-11T13:29:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>bcook</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2014-08-11T13:29:43+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=0b3a4a686dffa3c2cbaa5c8b196b6c5319d92347'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0b3a4a686dffa3c2cbaa5c8b196b6c5319d92347</id>
<content type='text'>
Most assembly blocks remain inactive if OPENSSL_NO_ASM is not defined,
only enabling inline assembly, but the RSA / RC4-5 blocks (used only in
amd64 systems) turn on implicitly. Guard these two as well.

This simplifies enabling just inline ASM in portable, no effective
change in OpenBSD.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sort CFLAGS, SRC and SSLASM stanzas by the directories they apply to, to make</title>
<updated>2014-05-06T19:55:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>miod</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2014-05-06T19:55:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=961f4fd24efe181e4901963818e552c67df94ce8'/>
<id>urn:sha1:961f4fd24efe181e4901963818e552c67df94ce8</id>
<content type='text'>
these files similar in layout to the other md Makefile.inc; no functional
change.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Move the machine-specific parts of the libcrypto Makefile to per-arch makefile</title>
<updated>2014-04-17T18:11:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>miod</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2014-04-17T18:11:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=22bab90c92ee62bbe16d73084a853233fc368a8e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:22bab90c92ee62bbe16d73084a853233fc368a8e</id>
<content type='text'>
fragments, to ease maintainance, and see through the fog of bugs.

"looks good" deraadt@
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
