<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>openbsd/src/lib/libcrypto/ppccpuid.pl, branch OPENBSD_6_8_BASE</title>
<subtitle>A mirror of https://github.com/libressl/openbsd.git
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/atom?h=OPENBSD_6_8_BASE</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/atom?h=OPENBSD_6_8_BASE'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/'/>
<updated>2014-05-03T11:39:46+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>Detect Altivec support with the machdep.altivec sysctl rather than setmp and</title>
<updated>2014-05-03T11:39:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>miod</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2014-05-03T11:39:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=f1d9f021298275631f549c14fbc07a67b9adc1fa'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f1d9f021298275631f549c14fbc07a67b9adc1fa</id>
<content type='text'>
a SIGILL handler.
Do not attempt to detect and use a 64-bit FPU yet.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Remove oh-so-important-from-a-security-pov OpenSSL_rtdsc() function.</title>
<updated>2014-04-17T18:49:35+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>miod</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2014-04-17T18:49:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=b4ee6facff27de9af90bfa187f0b058454154db5'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b4ee6facff27de9af90bfa187f0b058454154db5</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Ok, there was a need for OPENSSL_cleanse() instead of bzero() to prevent</title>
<updated>2014-04-17T18:16:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>miod</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2014-04-17T18:16:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=777aa5b3f157309dd7bae673d3f2ae8f37e71457'/>
<id>urn:sha1:777aa5b3f157309dd7bae673d3f2ae8f37e71457</id>
<content type='text'>
supposedly smart compilers from optimizing memory cleanups away. Understood.

Ok, in case of an hypothetically super smart compiler, OPENSSL_cleanse() had
to be convoluted enough for the compiler not to recognize that this was
actually bzero() in disguise. Understood.

But then why there had been optimized assembler versions of OPENSSL_cleanse()
is beyond me. Did someone not trust the C obfuscation?
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>import OpenSSL-1.0.1c</title>
<updated>2012-10-13T21:23:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>djm</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2012-10-13T21:23:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=228cae30b117c2493f69ad3c195341cd6ec8d430'/>
<id>urn:sha1:228cae30b117c2493f69ad3c195341cd6ec8d430</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>import OpenSSL-1.0.0a</title>
<updated>2010-10-01T22:54:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>djm</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2010-10-01T22:54:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=829fd51d4f8dde4a7f3bf54754f3c1d1a502f5e2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:829fd51d4f8dde4a7f3bf54754f3c1d1a502f5e2</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>import of OpenSSL 0.9.8k</title>
<updated>2009-04-06T06:30:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>djm</name>
<email></email>
</author>
<published>2009-04-06T06:30:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/commit/?id=2b6e09b39ef1d803b50ee024a06d1c250fde442d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:2b6e09b39ef1d803b50ee024a06d1c250fde442d</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
