openbsd/src/regress/lib/libc/db, branch OPENBSD_4_3 A mirror of https://github.com/libressl/openbsd.git https://git.lua4.win/openbsd/atom?h=OPENBSD_4_3 2003-07-31T21:48:04+00:00 various cleanups; david says results are same 2003-07-31T21:48:04+00:00 deraadt 2003-07-31T21:48:04+00:00 urn:sha1:33c506bfed3ead4cc96819ce600895082c214755 Remove the advertising clause in the UCB license which Berkeley 2003-06-02T19:38:25+00:00 millert 2003-06-02T19:38:25+00:00 urn:sha1:927c13bb6b3e182d86b54f5b8ab72bd80bf3d735 rescinded 22 July 1999. Proofed by myself and Theo. Rename a bunch of the old bsd.regress.mk variables into the new ones. 2002-09-02T20:01:43+00:00 avsm 2002-09-02T20:01:43+00:00 urn:sha1:0417492a9cd47355e6322690a822134d099084b8 ok art@ add missing CLEANFILES; ok miod@ 2002-08-21T22:49:41+00:00 wcobb 2002-08-21T22:49:41+00:00 urn:sha1:b4a4648ac600e2b5503b5b3b519429d6ca3a6503 We live in an ANSI C world. Remove lots of gratuitous #ifdef __STDC__ cruft. 2002-02-19T19:39:38+00:00 millert 2002-02-19T19:39:38+00:00 urn:sha1:0be1f7d80eff8e3e86b037958be3ab5217ce9b59 Rename private err() function to dberr() to avoid collision with 2002-02-18T21:40:46+00:00 millert 2002-02-18T21:40:46+00:00 urn:sha1:97ec74faebf84f0ecbbf3706ec05647d012003c9 libc's err(). Part one of userland __P removal. Done with a simple regexp with some minor hand editing to make comments line up correctly. Another pass is forthcoming that handles the cases that could not be done automatically. 2002-02-16T21:27:50+00:00 millert 2002-02-16T21:27:50+00:00 urn:sha1:052e020be6be85be6238c44b8386a61f8db7b6a4 3 12 and 20 are slow 2002-01-03T01:19:17+00:00 art 2002-01-03T01:19:17+00:00 urn:sha1:250feea02b871a4ce407e9501d6af1648d869dd1 depend the tests on the test program. 2002-01-03T00:22:47+00:00 art 2002-01-03T00:22:47+00:00 urn:sha1:6048e76a14c791a54184f6d1367dc3536fcac51a Split into smaller tests. It was easier than I thought. 2002-01-02T17:53:01+00:00 art 2002-01-02T17:53:01+00:00 urn:sha1:b846ad8dc7af50a533e10eb88c14b7ce9abf853a XXX - Can someone who understands this verify that test8 is correct? It doesn't return failure (it can't and the code has a strange comment about it), but it prints something on sparc64 that could be interpreted as an error message).