Simplify return call of rand() and rand_r() to make it easier to read.

This is slightly less robust, but RAND_MAX must be one below a power
of two in both variants anyway.

Based on a suggestion by Matthew Martin.

ok tedu@

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/lib/libc/stdlib/rand.c b/src/lib/libc/stdlib/rand.c
index 7054b81c64..56e672af01 100644
--- a/src/lib/libc/stdlib/rand.c
+++ b/src/lib/libc/stdlib/rand.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ int
 rand_r(u_int *seed)
 {
         *seed = *seed * 1103515245 + 12345;
-        return (*seed % ((u_int)RAND_MAX + 1));
+        return (*seed & RAND_MAX);
 }
 DEF_WEAK(rand_r);
 
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int
 rand(void)
 {
         if (rand_deterministic == 0)
-                return (arc4random() % ((u_int)RAND_MAX + 1));
+                return (arc4random() & RAND_MAX);
         return (rand_r(&next));
 }