5 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/bn/bn_lib.c b/src/lib/libcrypto/bn/bn_lib.c
index 311ec2044d..17f4ae89da 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/bn/bn_lib.c
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/bn/bn_lib.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: bn_lib.c,v 1.35 2016/03/04 16:23:30 deraadt Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: bn_lib.c,v 1.36 2016/03/15 20:50:22 krw Exp $ */
 /* Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com)
  * All rights reserved.
  *
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bn_expand_internal(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
                          * The fact that the loop is unrolled
                          * 4-wise is a tribute to Intel. It's
                          * the one that doesn't have enough
-                         * registers to accomodate more data.
+                         * registers to accommodate more data.
                          * I'd unroll it 8-wise otherwise:-)
                          *
                          *              <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/dso/dso.h b/src/lib/libcrypto/dso/dso.h
index 42de08089e..6c982c9f97 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/dso/dso.h
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/dso/dso.h
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: dso.h,v 1.11 2015/02/07 13:19:15 doug Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: dso.h,v 1.12 2016/03/15 20:50:22 krw Exp $ */
 /* Written by Geoff Thorpe (geoff@geoffthorpe.net) for the OpenSSL
  * project 2000.
  */
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ DSO_METHOD *DSO_METHOD_dlfcn(void);
  * returns the number of characters [including trailing zero]
  * written to it. If 'sz' is 0 or negative, 'path' is ignored and
  * required amount of charachers [including trailing zero] to
- * accomodate pathname is returned. If 'addr' is NULL, then
+ * accommodate pathname is returned. If 'addr' is NULL, then
  * pathname of cryptolib itself is returned. Negative or zero
  * return value denotes error.
  */
diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/asm/sha1-mips.pl b/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/asm/sha1-mips.pl
index 0590b7cdb2..75fe7113e2 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/asm/sha1-mips.pl
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/asm/sha1-mips.pl
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($i<79);
 ___
 }
 
-$FRAMESIZE=16;  # large enough to accomodate NUBI saved registers
+$FRAMESIZE=16;  # large enough to accommodate NUBI saved registers
 $SAVED_REGS_MASK = ($flavour =~ /nubi/i) ? 0xc0fff008 : 0xc0ff0000;
 
 $code=<<___;
diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/sha_locl.h b/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/sha_locl.h
index f56ac5b9b7..d871a3b69d 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/sha_locl.h
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/sha/sha_locl.h
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: sha_locl.h,v 1.20 2015/09/13 21:09:56 doug Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: sha_locl.h,v 1.21 2016/03/15 20:50:22 krw Exp $ */
 /* Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com)
  * All rights reserved.
  *
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int SHA1_Init(SHA_CTX *c)
 #ifndef MD32_XARRAY
   /*
    * Originally X was an array. As it's automatic it's natural
-   * to expect RISC compiler to accomodate at least part of it in
+   * to expect RISC compiler to accommodate at least part of it in
    * the register bank, isn't it? Unfortunately not all compilers
    * "find" this expectation reasonable:-( On order to make such
    * compilers generate better code I replace X[] with a bunch of
diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c b/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c
index d357e529ca..9a681c2888 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: wp_block.c,v 1.9 2014/07/09 16:06:13 miod Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: wp_block.c,v 1.10 2016/03/15 20:50:22 krw Exp $ */
 /**
  * The Whirlpool hashing function.
  *
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ typedef unsigned long long	u64;
  * one quadword load. One can argue that that many single-byte loads
  * is too excessive, as one could load a quadword and "milk" it for
  * eight 8-bit values instead. Well, yes, but in order to do so *and*
- * avoid excessive loads you have to accomodate a handful of 64-bit
+ * avoid excessive loads you have to accommodate a handful of 64-bit
  * values in the register bank and issue a bunch of shifts and mask.
  * It's a tradeoff: loads vs. shift and mask in big register bank[!].
  * On most CPUs eight single-byte loads are faster and I let other