| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Move the description of the EVP_MD_FLAGs to EVP_MD_nid() and add a
reference to the CMS specification.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This could have been removed in an earlier bump. Now it's time for it to
say goodbye.
ok jsing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These functions change signed & unsigned attributes of a CMS SignerInfo object
With & OK tb@
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
but it is still excessively long and complicated. To reduce the amount
of distractions a bit, split out three deprecated functions into a new
manual page EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(3). No text change.
In part suggested by tb@, who agrees with the direction.
|
| |
|
|
| |
They document functionality that no longer exists.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These were the last four RFC 3779 things that check_complete.pl x509v3
complained about. I will surely tweak and try to improve a few things
in the coming days, but the pages should now be stable enough that
review efforts will likely not be wasted. Any feedback appreciated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
First RFC 3779 page without a BUG section. It could have one, but I'm
in a lenient mood right now. Maybe it's just that this is bad but not
quite as bad as EVP.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Also note another bug in X509v3_asid_{canonize,is_canonical}(3).
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Let's just say there's room for improvement...
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
ASRange and ASIdOrRange
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This documents the part of the API that allows building the two
extensions. It is all very complicated and the bug density is
quite high. Surely there's lots of room for improvement, but
I've been sitting way too long on versions of these. I'll never
finish. Let's fix and improve in tree.
|
| |
|
|
| |
also documenting EVP_PKEY_CTX_get0_pkey(3)
|
| |
|
|
| |
out of the large EVP_DigestInit(3). No text change.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_flags(3) out of the excessively large and
unwieldy EVP_EncryptInit(3). This causes a number of inaccuracies
and gaps to stand out, but i'm not mixing text changes or content
additions into this split.
Using very useful feedback from tb@ regarding what belongs together
and how important the various functions are. I refrained from bothering
him with the complete patch, but he likes the general direction.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The function prototypes in the SYNOPSIS don't look great, but schwarze
assures me that this is how it is supposed to be. It is rather strange
that OpenSSL chose to sprinkle OPENSSL_init_crypto() calls into these
four functions rather than two inside OBJ_NAME_do_all{,_sorted}(3).
Surely there was a good reason for that.
With input and fixes from schwarze
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
into a new EVP_sha1(3) manual page, and also mention EVP_md4(3) there.
Using input from tb@ and jsing@, who like the general direction.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
and EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_cipher_data(3).
Import the manual page from the OpenSSL 1.1 branch, which is still
under a free licence, with several improvements by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These and EVP_{add,remove}_{cipher,digest}_alias() are mostly for internal
use.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
which is still under a free license, to work on it in the tree.
The required content changes have not been done yet,
i only tweaked the markup and wording so far.
|
| |
|
|
| |
a free license, tweaked by me
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove their documentation and mark some associated constants as
intentionally undocumented until they will be removed from public
headers.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This function will be made internal-only and likely be renamed/rewritten.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This way we will have a manual corresponding to an existing function after
the next bump.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Update EXFLAG_PROXY and X509_V_FLAG_ALLOW_PROXY_CERTS documentation since
we need to keep them for the time being.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Mop up documentation mentioning it or any of its numerous accessors that
almost nothing ever used.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Unused and no authorative information was found online in 2016
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
feedback and OK tb@
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Document it.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
concerning arithmetic in Galois fields of power-of-2 order
|