| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Much more apt than the current operation names.
Names suggested by jca@ ages ago.
ok jca, jsing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use more descriptive names, and make it clearer that real and user
timers work on different static storage. The end goal is to be able to
reuse those timer functions, instead of inlining other timer
implementations subject to clock jumps.
Discussed with Scott Cheloha
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ok semarie@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
openssl(1) has two mechanisms for operating: either a single execution
of one command (looking at argv[0] or argv[1]) or as an interactive
session than may execute any number of commands.
We already have a top level pledge that should cover all commands
and that's what interactive mode must continue using. However, we can
tighten up the pledges when only executing one command.
This is an initial stab at support and may contain regressions. Most
commands only need "stdio rpath wpath cpath". The pledges could be
further restricted by evaluating the situation after parsing options.
deraadt@ and beck@ are roughly fine with this approach.
|
|
|
|
| |
line in the summary.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MD4 should have been removed a long time ago. Also, RFC 6150 moved it to
historic in 2011. Rides the major crank from removing SHA-0.
Discussed with many including beck@, millert@, djm@, sthen@
ok jsing@, input + ok bcook@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds aes-128-gcm aes-256-gcm chacha20-poly1305
from Adam Langley's original patch for OpenSSL
ok beck@ jsing@
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We do not have any builtin or dynamic engines, meaning openssl(1) has
no way to use the engine command or parameters at all.
ok jsing@
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
provided by progs.h). Also, move the FUNCTION type (and flags) into
openssl.c since that is the only place of use. Lastly, remove pointless
'extern' from the prototypes and use char **argv instead of char *argv[]
(the former is used elsewhere).
ok deraadt@ doug@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Coverity 72744 noticed that rsa_count was overwitten. The underlying
issue is that this code is supposed to be in an else block.
ok bcook@
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ok deraadt@ jsing@ miod@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From OpenSSL commits:
6f91b017bbb7140f816721141ac156d1b828a6b3
75d0ebef2aef7a2c77b27575b8da898e22f3ccd5
a2b18e657ea1a932d125154f4e13ab2258796d90
ok miod@, jsing@
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
also check the return value of an adjacent malloc() call.
ok jsing@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
apart from introducing a bug where the -elapsed option is not listed in
the usage output when it should be.
feedback/ok bcook@ jsing@
|
|
|
|
| |
ok bcook@
|
|
a system/superuser binary. At the same time, move the source code from its
current lib/libssl/src/apps location to a more appropriate home under
usr.bin/openssl.
ok deraadt@ miod@
|