From 4895438d43fba93c4ffc4bf8cfdc8c2a46cc8073 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: krw <>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:50:22 +0000
Subject: 'accomodate' -> 'accommodate' in comments.

Started by diff from Mical Mazurek.
---
 src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool')

diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c b/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c
index d357e529ca..9a681c2888 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/whrlpool/wp_block.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: wp_block.c,v 1.9 2014/07/09 16:06:13 miod Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: wp_block.c,v 1.10 2016/03/15 20:50:22 krw Exp $ */
 /**
  * The Whirlpool hashing function.
  *
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ typedef unsigned long long	u64;
  * one quadword load. One can argue that that many single-byte loads
  * is too excessive, as one could load a quadword and "milk" it for
  * eight 8-bit values instead. Well, yes, but in order to do so *and*
- * avoid excessive loads you have to accomodate a handful of 64-bit
+ * avoid excessive loads you have to accommodate a handful of 64-bit
  * values in the register bank and issue a bunch of shifts and mask.
  * It's a tradeoff: loads vs. shift and mask in big register bank[!].
  * On most CPUs eight single-byte loads are faster and I let other
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-55-g6feb