From 692d9f352c2adc7dc27feedeecb0aec78410acba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: miod <>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:29:10 +0000
Subject: belive -> believe

---
 src/lib/libcrypto/des/times/usparc.cc | 2 +-
 src/lib/libcrypto/ripemd/README       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/lib/libcrypto')

diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/des/times/usparc.cc b/src/lib/libcrypto/des/times/usparc.cc
index f6ec8e8831..0864285ef6 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/des/times/usparc.cc
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/des/times/usparc.cc
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
 
 For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
 gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
-I belive the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
+I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
 is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'.  For 'speed', the DES
 routines are being linked from a library.  I'll record the higher
 speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/ripemd/README b/src/lib/libcrypto/ripemd/README
index 7097707264..f1ffc8b134 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/ripemd/README
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/ripemd/README
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/ripemd160.html
 This is my implementation of RIPEMD-160.  The pentium assember is a little
 off the pace since I only get 1050 cycles, while the best is 1013.
 I have a few ideas for how to get another 20 or so cycles, but at
-this point I will not bother right now.  I belive the trick will be
+this point I will not bother right now.  I believe the trick will be
 to remove my 'copy X array onto stack' until inside the RIP1() finctions the
 first time round.  To do this I need another register and will only have one
 temporary one.  A bit tricky....  I can also cleanup the saving of the 5 words
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-55-g6feb