portable/m4, branch v4.3.2A mirror of https://github.com/libressl/portable.git
https://git.lua4.win/portable/atom?h=v4.3.22026-05-24T10:22:30+00:00Do not override user CFLAGS/LDFLAGS in hardening flag detection2026-05-24T10:22:30+00:00Kenjiro Nakayamanakayamakenjiro@gmail.com2026-04-30T06:00:14+00:00urn:sha1:7573f4ae7505549646289264646a933ef153fdb6
`CHECK_CFLAG` / `CHECK_LDFLAG` overwrote `CFLAGS`/`LDFLAGS` with only
the flag under test, so feature detection ran with a different target
than the real build.
For example `CFLAGS=-march=i586 ./configure` accepted
`-fcf-protection=full` (detected under the toolchain's i686 default)
but then failed to compile because GCC 15 rejects `-fcf-protection` on
i586.
Prepend `$USER_CFLAGS` / `$USER_LDFLAGS` (saved before `AC_PROG_CC`)
to the detection command so the probe matches the real build.
Fixes #1268
move ftruncate to common libcompat for tests2025-10-07T09:23:58+00:00Brent Cookbusterb@gmail.com2025-10-07T08:49:29+00:00urn:sha1:659e87fe1cf3348a4e9f1bacfe205316fefd8a51Revert "trim some whitespace for hpux checks"2025-08-25T06:03:51+00:00Theo Buehlertb@openbsd.org2025-08-25T06:02:57+00:00urn:sha1:4494cd0525db4decd7a3bab7491888a334dec8aa
This reverts commit 48d4157f99c00a1180db5298385d396ef840adda.
because it didn't trim whitespace and doesn't look right.
Pointed out by @vszakats in
https://github.com/libressl/portable/pull/1165#pullrequestreview-3148582342
adjust incorrect commit years2025-06-01T14:24:24+00:00Brent Cookbusterb@gmail.com2025-06-01T14:24:24+00:00urn:sha1:5d9229b16966f8135de4d78ecdefd4230f8e3383
Co-authored-by: Theo Buehler <botovq@users.noreply.github.com>add autotools build copyright headers2025-06-01T01:22:33+00:00Brent Cookbusterb@gmail.com2025-06-01T01:20:41+00:00urn:sha1:340037f69a425d87aedc8c793e821a4946660938trim some whitespace for hpux checks2025-05-19T05:25:30+00:00Brent Cookbusterb@gmail.com2025-05-19T05:25:30+00:00urn:sha1:48d4157f99c00a1180db5298385d396ef840addaProvide getdelim and getline compat shims2024-12-20T00:14:04+00:00Theo Buehlertb@openbsd.org2024-12-19T19:24:33+00:00urn:sha1:bf808ea0fc581f58ec4aabd9d7f24d3a5275bc7a
These are portable implementations from NetBSD that are needed on
Windows and perhaps some other platforms with the new versions of
the mlkem tests.
Warn on unsupported operating systems2024-11-02T13:13:17+00:00Jonas 'Sortie' Termansensortie@maxsi.org2024-11-02T13:13:17+00:00urn:sha1:4db5917a6d51dfa71d446e1de5e51a5ca089a109Assume unknown operating systems use ELF.2024-11-02T12:45:50+00:00Jonas 'Sortie' Termansensortie@maxsi.org2024-11-02T12:43:17+00:00urn:sha1:2f680db530996204949edcf3f14c3c7569c1a21f
There's a lot of new Unix-like operating systems out that that might
port LibreSSL (my Sortix is among them) and they all use ELF. If the
operating system doesn't use ELF or isn't an Unix, it doesn't have a
chance at working out of this box anyway, and this change makes
LibreSSL work on a generic and sufficiently featured POSIX system.
Land #1048, clarify that Windows builds are easy2024-05-28T13:25:41+00:00Brent Cookbusterb@gmail.com2024-05-28T13:25:41+00:00urn:sha1:d9c3a5000c182fd1c8beb253970d2661e0b54516