Larry Doolittle writes:

This is a bulk spelling fix patch against busybox-1.00-pre10.
If anyone gets a corrupted copy (and cares), let me know and
I will make alternate arrangements.

Erik - please apply.

Authors - please check that I didn't corrupt any meaning.

Package importers - see if any of these changes should be
passed to the upstream authors.

I glossed over lots of sloppy capitalizations, missing apostrophes,
mixed American/British spellings, and German-style compound words.

What is "pretect redefined for test" in cmdedit.c?

Good luck on the 1.00 release!

      - Larry


git-svn-id: svn://busybox.net/trunk/busybox@8759 69ca8d6d-28ef-0310-b511-8ec308f3f277

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/modutils/insmod.c b/modutils/insmod.c
index d788a76c3..63ee9da71 100644
--- a/modutils/insmod.c
+++ b/modutils/insmod.c
@@ -282,11 +282,11 @@ extern int insmod_ng_main( int argc, char **argv);
 #ifndef MODUTILS_MODULE_H
 static const int MODUTILS_MODULE_H = 1;
 
-#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.116 2004/04/06 11:56:26 andersen Exp $"
+#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.117 2004/04/14 17:51:22 andersen Exp $"
 
 /* This file contains the structures used by the 2.0 and 2.1 kernels.
    We do not use the kernel headers directly because we do not wish
-   to be dependant on a particular kernel version to compile insmod.  */
+   to be dependent on a particular kernel version to compile insmod.  */
 
 
 /*======================================================================*/
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ int delete_module(const char *);
 #ifndef MODUTILS_OBJ_H
 static const int MODUTILS_OBJ_H = 1;
 
-#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.116 2004/04/06 11:56:26 andersen Exp $"
+#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.117 2004/04/14 17:51:22 andersen Exp $"
 
 /* The relocatable object is manipulated using elfin types.  */
 
@@ -2597,8 +2597,8 @@ new_process_module_arguments(struct obj_file *f, int argc, char **argv)
                                                 str = alloca(r - q + 1);
                                                 memcpy(str, q, r - q);
 
-                                                /* I don't know if it is usefull, as the previous case
-                                                   doesn't null terminate the string ??? */
+                                                /* I don't know if it is useful, as the previous case
+                                                   doesn't nul terminate the string ??? */
                                                 str[r - q] = '\0';
 
                                                 /* Keep next fields */