diff options
author | Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> | 2025-08-09 17:39:44 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> | 2025-08-09 17:39:44 +0200 |
commit | 4ce8afe6b2a989a0360c09a81c6bf9d43d6ba24a (patch) | |
tree | 4a980bfce0e10ebdc23468f43960e4ecbf8edb65 /shell/hush_test/hush-parsing/escape4.tests | |
parent | df154028dc1257a03cbbcf322a6c31eb9552a661 (diff) | |
download | busybox-w32-busybox.tar.gz busybox-w32-busybox.tar.bz2 busybox-w32-busybox.zip |
ahs: jobs: Block signals during tcsetpgrpbusybox
Upstream commit:
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:45:12 +1100
jobs: Block signals during tcsetpgrp
Harald van Dijk <harald@gigawatt.nl> wrote:
> On 19/12/2020 22:21, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
>> <20201219172838.1B-WB%steffen@sdaoden.eu>:
>> |Long story short, after falsely accusing BSD make of not working
>>
>> After dinner i shortened it a bit more, and attach it again, ok?
>> It is terrible, but now less redundant than before.
>> Sorry for being so terse, that problem crosses my head for about
>> a week, and i was totally mislead and if you bang your head
>> against the wall so many hours bugs or misbehaviours in a handful
>> of other programs is not the expected outcome.
>
> I think a minimal test case is simply
>
> all:
> $(SHELL) -c 'trap "echo TTOU" TTOU; set -m; echo all good'
>
> unless I accidentally oversimplified.
>
> The SIGTTOU is caused by setjobctl's xtcsetpgrp(fd, pgrp) call to make
> its newly started process group the foreground process group when job
> control is enabled, where xtcsetpgrp is a wrapper for tcsetpgrp. (That's
> in dash, the other variants may have some small differences.) tcsetpgrp
> has this little bit in its specification:
>
> Attempts to use tcsetpgrp() from a process which is a member of
> a background process group on a fildes associated with its con‐
> trolling terminal shall cause the process group to be sent a
> SIGTTOU signal. If the calling thread is blocking SIGTTOU sig‐
> nals or the process is ignoring SIGTTOU signals, the process
> shall be allowed to perform the operation, and no signal is
> sent.
>
> Ordinarily, when job control is enabled, SIGTTOU is ignored. However,
> when a trap action is specified for SIGTTOU, the signal is not ignored,
> and there is no blocking in place either, so the tcsetpgrp() call is not
> allowed.
>
> The lowest impact change to make here, the one that otherwise preserves
> the existing shell behaviour, is to block signals before calling
> tcsetpgrp and unblocking them afterwards. This ensures SIGTTOU does not
> get raised here, but also ensures that if SIGTTOU is sent to the shell
> for another reason, there is no window where it gets silently ignored.
>
> Another way to fix this is by not trying to make the shell start a new
> process group, or at least not make it the foreground process group.
> Most other shells appear to not try to do this.
This patch implements the blocking of SIGTTOU (and everything else)
while we call tcsetpgrp.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'shell/hush_test/hush-parsing/escape4.tests')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions