summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authordaurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com>2015-08-09 00:34:16 +1000
committerdaurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com>2015-12-18 22:28:47 +1100
commitdd9216f46e2f2a3f55dcf4486db8bb36a4f48fdb (patch)
treef903d415b07ed7c40373097255c0eeabf57ef08f
parentae502efbb770605babdf3f73aedfc19be42fe426 (diff)
downloadluaossl-dd9216f46e2f2a3f55dcf4486db8bb36a4f48fdb.tar.gz
luaossl-dd9216f46e2f2a3f55dcf4486db8bb36a4f48fdb.tar.bz2
luaossl-dd9216f46e2f2a3f55dcf4486db8bb36a4f48fdb.zip
remove trailing whitespace
-rw-r--r--src/openssl.c24
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/src/openssl.c b/src/openssl.c
index 9c0f852..e8ec0f4 100644
--- a/src/openssl.c
+++ b/src/openssl.c
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static int badoption(lua_State *L, int index, const char *opt) {
314 314
315static int checkoption(lua_State *L, int index, const char *def, const char *const opts[]) { 315static int checkoption(lua_State *L, int index, const char *def, const char *const opts[]) {
316 const char *opt = (def)? luaL_optstring(L, index, def) : luaL_checkstring(L, index); 316 const char *opt = (def)? luaL_optstring(L, index, def) : luaL_checkstring(L, index);
317 int i; 317 int i;
318 318
319 for (i = 0; opts[i]; i++) { 319 for (i = 0; opts[i]; i++) {
320 if (strieq(opts[i], opt)) 320 if (strieq(opts[i], opt))
@@ -3826,7 +3826,7 @@ static double timeutc(ASN1_TIME *time) {
3826 3826
3827 gmtoff *= sign; 3827 gmtoff *= sign;
3828 } 3828 }
3829 3829
3830 return tm2unix(&tm, gmtoff); 3830 return tm2unix(&tm, gmtoff);
3831badfmt: 3831badfmt:
3832 return INFINITY; 3832 return INFINITY;
@@ -7114,7 +7114,7 @@ static unsigned long long rand_llu(lua_State *L) {
7114 * The following algorithm for rand_uniform() is taken from OpenBSD's 7114 * The following algorithm for rand_uniform() is taken from OpenBSD's
7115 * arc4random_uniform, written by Otto Moerbeek, with subsequent 7115 * arc4random_uniform, written by Otto Moerbeek, with subsequent
7116 * simplification by Jorden Verwer. Otto's source code comment reads 7116 * simplification by Jorden Verwer. Otto's source code comment reads
7117 * 7117 *
7118 * Uniformity is achieved by generating new random numbers until the one 7118 * Uniformity is achieved by generating new random numbers until the one
7119 * returned is outside the range [0, 2**32 % upper_bound). This guarantees 7119 * returned is outside the range [0, 2**32 % upper_bound). This guarantees
7120 * the selected random number will be inside [2**32 % upper_bound, 2**32) 7120 * the selected random number will be inside [2**32 % upper_bound, 2**32)
@@ -7137,22 +7137,22 @@ static unsigned long long rand_llu(lua_State *L) {
7137 * X-Complaints-To: ne...@news.purdue.edu 7137 * X-Complaints-To: ne...@news.purdue.edu
7138 * NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:20:37 +0000 (UTC) 7138 * NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:20:37 +0000 (UTC)
7139 * Xref: archiver1.google.com sci.crypt:78935 7139 * Xref: archiver1.google.com sci.crypt:78935
7140 * 7140 *
7141 * In article <3DCD8D7...@nospam.com>, 7141 * In article <3DCD8D7...@nospam.com>,
7142 * Michael Amling <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: 7142 * Michael Amling <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
7143 * >Carlos Moreno wrote: 7143 * >Carlos Moreno wrote:
7144 * 7144 *
7145 * I have already posted on this, but a repeat might be 7145 * I have already posted on this, but a repeat might be
7146 * in order. 7146 * in order.
7147 * 7147 *
7148 * If one can trust random bits, the most bitwise efficient 7148 * If one can trust random bits, the most bitwise efficient
7149 * manner to get a single random integer between 0 and N-1 7149 * manner to get a single random integer between 0 and N-1
7150 * can be obtained as follows; the code can be made more 7150 * can be obtained as follows; the code can be made more
7151 * computationally efficient. I believe it is easier to 7151 * computationally efficient. I believe it is easier to
7152 * understand with gotos. I am assuming N>1. 7152 * understand with gotos. I am assuming N>1.
7153 * 7153 *
7154 * i = 0; j = 1; 7154 * i = 0; j = 1;
7155 * 7155 *
7156 * loop: j=2*j; i=2*i+RANBIT; 7156 * loop: j=2*j; i=2*i+RANBIT;
7157 * if (j < N) goto loop; 7157 * if (j < N) goto loop;
7158 * if (i >= N) { 7158 * if (i >= N) {
@@ -7160,14 +7160,14 @@ static unsigned long long rand_llu(lua_State *L) {
7160 * j = j - N; 7160 * j = j - N;
7161 * goto loop:} 7161 * goto loop:}
7162 * else return (i); 7162 * else return (i);
7163 * 7163 *
7164 * The algorithm works because at each stage i is uniform 7164 * The algorithm works because at each stage i is uniform
7165 * between 0 and j-1. 7165 * between 0 and j-1.
7166 * 7166 *
7167 * Another possibility is to generate k bits, where 2^k >= N. 7167 * Another possibility is to generate k bits, where 2^k >= N.
7168 * If 2^k = c*N + remainder, generate the appropriate value 7168 * If 2^k = c*N + remainder, generate the appropriate value
7169 * if a k-bit random number is less than c*N. 7169 * if a k-bit random number is less than c*N.
7170 * 7170 *
7171 * For N = 17 (numbers just larger than powers of 2 are "bad"), 7171 * For N = 17 (numbers just larger than powers of 2 are "bad"),
7172 * the amount of information is about 4.09 bits, the best 7172 * the amount of information is about 4.09 bits, the best
7173 * algorithm to generate one random number takes about 5.765 7173 * algorithm to generate one random number takes about 5.765
@@ -7345,7 +7345,7 @@ static int mt_init(void) {
7345 int i; 7345 int i;
7346 7346
7347 mt_state.nlock = CRYPTO_num_locks(); 7347 mt_state.nlock = CRYPTO_num_locks();
7348 7348
7349 if (!(mt_state.lock = malloc(mt_state.nlock * sizeof *mt_state.lock))) { 7349 if (!(mt_state.lock = malloc(mt_state.nlock * sizeof *mt_state.lock))) {
7350 error = errno; 7350 error = errno;
7351 goto epilog; 7351 goto epilog;