diff options
author | jsing <> | 2021-01-05 16:45:59 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | jsing <> | 2021-01-05 16:45:59 +0000 |
commit | 90ef40ae9d614b7e8df22be569d2596374073170 (patch) | |
tree | 5a414cc80415ce1baabbba3babc15cc0a7244cee /src/lib/libc/stdlib/getsubopt.c | |
parent | 8c63e949ca60ff58f50aea6e577f86c886f0a174 (diff) | |
download | openbsd-90ef40ae9d614b7e8df22be569d2596374073170.tar.gz openbsd-90ef40ae9d614b7e8df22be569d2596374073170.tar.bz2 openbsd-90ef40ae9d614b7e8df22be569d2596374073170.zip |
Gracefully handle root certificates being both trusted and untrusted.
When a certificate (namely a root) is specified as both a trusted and
untrusted certificate, the new verifier will find multiple chains - the
first being back to the trusted root certificate and a second via the root
that is untrusted, followed by the trusted root certificate. This situation
can be triggered by a server that (unnecessarily) includes the root
certificate in its certificate list.
While this validates correctly (using the first chain), it means that we
encounter a failure while building the second chain due to the root
certificate already being in the chain. When this occurs we call the verify
callback indicating a bad certificate. Some sensitive software (including
bacula and icinga), treat this single bad chain callback as terminal, even
though we successfully verify the certificate.
Avoid this problem by simply dumping the chain if we encounter a situation
where the certificate is already in the chain and also a trusted root -
we'll have already picked up the trusted root as a shorter path.
Issue with icinga2 initially reported by Theodore Wynnychenko.
Fix tested by sthen@ for both bacula and icinga2.
ok tb@
Diffstat (limited to 'src/lib/libc/stdlib/getsubopt.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions