Provide correct version details for LibreSSL.

ok beck@ deraadt@ miod@

2 files changed, 6 insertions, 154 deletions

diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/opensslv.h b/src/lib/libcrypto/opensslv.h
index f9aaed4574..ad602b054c 100644
--- a/src/lib/libcrypto/opensslv.h
+++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/opensslv.h
@@ -1,86 +1,12 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: opensslv.h,v 1.25 2014/06/12 15:49:27 deraadt Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: opensslv.h,v 1.26 2014/07/11 11:43:49 jsing Exp $ */
 #ifndef HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
 #define HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
 
-/* Numeric release version identifier:
- * MNNFFPPS: major minor fix patch status
- * The status nibble has one of the values 0 for development, 1 to e for betas
- * 1 to 14, and f for release.  The patch level is exactly that.
- * For example:
- * 0.9.3-dev      0x00903000
- * 0.9.3-beta1    0x00903001
- * 0.9.3-beta2-dev 0x00903002
- * 0.9.3-beta2    0x00903002 (same as ...beta2-dev)
- * 0.9.3          0x0090300f
- * 0.9.3a         0x0090301f
- * 0.9.4          0x0090400f
- * 1.2.3z         0x102031af
- *
- * For continuity reasons (because 0.9.5 is already out, and is coded
- * 0x00905100), between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6 the coding of the patch level
- * part is slightly different, by setting the highest bit.  This means
- * that 0.9.5a looks like this: 0x0090581f.  At 0.9.6, we can start
- * with 0x0090600S...
- *
- * (Prior to 0.9.3-dev a different scheme was used: 0.9.2b is 0x0922.)
- * (Prior to 0.9.5a beta1, a different scheme was used: MMNNFFRBB for
- *  major minor fix final patch/beta)
- */
-#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER  0x1000107fL
-#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT    "OpenSSL 1.0.1g 7 Apr 2014"
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER  0x20000000L
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT    "LibreSSL 2.0"
 #define OPENSSL_VERSION_PTEXT   " part of " OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT
 
-
-/* The macros below are to be used for shared library (.so, .dll, ...)
- * versioning.  That kind of versioning works a bit differently between
- * operating systems.  The most usual scheme is to set a major and a minor
- * number, and have the runtime loader check that the major number is equal
- * to what it was at application link time, while the minor number has to
- * be greater or equal to what it was at application link time.  With this
- * scheme, the version number is usually part of the file name, like this:
- *
- *      libcrypto.so.0.9
- *
- * Some unixen also make a softlink with the major verson number only:
- *
- *      libcrypto.so.0
- *
- * On Tru64 and IRIX 6.x it works a little bit differently.  There, the
- * shared library version is stored in the file, and is actually a series
- * of versions, separated by colons.  The rightmost version present in the
- * library when linking an application is stored in the application to be
- * matched at run time.  When the application is run, a check is done to
- * see if the library version stored in the application matches any of the
- * versions in the version string of the library itself.
- * This version string can be constructed in any way, depending on what
- * kind of matching is desired.  However, to implement the same scheme as
- * the one used in the other unixen, all compatible versions, from lowest
- * to highest, should be part of the string.  Consecutive builds would
- * give the following versions strings:
- *
- *      3.0
- *      3.0:3.1
- *      3.0:3.1:3.2
- *      4.0
- *      4.0:4.1
- *
- * Notice how version 4 is completely incompatible with version, and
- * therefore give the breach you can see.
- *
- * There may be other schemes as well that I haven't yet discovered.
- *
- * So, here's the way it works here: first of all, the library version
- * number doesn't need at all to match the overall OpenSSL version.
- * However, it's nice and more understandable if it actually does.
- * The current library version is stored in the macro SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER,
- * which is just a piece of text in the format "M.m.e" (Major, minor, edit).
- * For the sake of Tru64, IRIX, and any other OS that behaves in similar ways,
- * we need to keep a history of version numbers, which is done in the
- * macro SHLIB_VERSION_HISTORY.  The numbers are separated by colons and
- * should only keep the versions that are binary compatible with the current.
- */
 #define SHLIB_VERSION_HISTORY ""
 #define SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER "1.0.0"
 
-
 #endif /* HEADER_OPENSSLV_H */
diff --git a/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/opensslv.h b/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/opensslv.h
index f9aaed4574..ad602b054c 100644
--- a/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/opensslv.h
+++ b/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/opensslv.h
@@ -1,86 +1,12 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: opensslv.h,v 1.25 2014/06/12 15:49:27 deraadt Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: opensslv.h,v 1.26 2014/07/11 11:43:49 jsing Exp $ */
 #ifndef HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
 #define HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
 
-/* Numeric release version identifier:
- * MNNFFPPS: major minor fix patch status
- * The status nibble has one of the values 0 for development, 1 to e for betas
- * 1 to 14, and f for release.  The patch level is exactly that.
- * For example:
- * 0.9.3-dev      0x00903000
- * 0.9.3-beta1    0x00903001
- * 0.9.3-beta2-dev 0x00903002
- * 0.9.3-beta2    0x00903002 (same as ...beta2-dev)
- * 0.9.3          0x0090300f
- * 0.9.3a         0x0090301f
- * 0.9.4          0x0090400f
- * 1.2.3z         0x102031af
- *
- * For continuity reasons (because 0.9.5 is already out, and is coded
- * 0x00905100), between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6 the coding of the patch level
- * part is slightly different, by setting the highest bit.  This means
- * that 0.9.5a looks like this: 0x0090581f.  At 0.9.6, we can start
- * with 0x0090600S...
- *
- * (Prior to 0.9.3-dev a different scheme was used: 0.9.2b is 0x0922.)
- * (Prior to 0.9.5a beta1, a different scheme was used: MMNNFFRBB for
- *  major minor fix final patch/beta)
- */
-#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER  0x1000107fL
-#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT    "OpenSSL 1.0.1g 7 Apr 2014"
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER  0x20000000L
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT    "LibreSSL 2.0"
 #define OPENSSL_VERSION_PTEXT   " part of " OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT
 
-
-/* The macros below are to be used for shared library (.so, .dll, ...)
- * versioning.  That kind of versioning works a bit differently between
- * operating systems.  The most usual scheme is to set a major and a minor
- * number, and have the runtime loader check that the major number is equal
- * to what it was at application link time, while the minor number has to
- * be greater or equal to what it was at application link time.  With this
- * scheme, the version number is usually part of the file name, like this:
- *
- *      libcrypto.so.0.9
- *
- * Some unixen also make a softlink with the major verson number only:
- *
- *      libcrypto.so.0
- *
- * On Tru64 and IRIX 6.x it works a little bit differently.  There, the
- * shared library version is stored in the file, and is actually a series
- * of versions, separated by colons.  The rightmost version present in the
- * library when linking an application is stored in the application to be
- * matched at run time.  When the application is run, a check is done to
- * see if the library version stored in the application matches any of the
- * versions in the version string of the library itself.
- * This version string can be constructed in any way, depending on what
- * kind of matching is desired.  However, to implement the same scheme as
- * the one used in the other unixen, all compatible versions, from lowest
- * to highest, should be part of the string.  Consecutive builds would
- * give the following versions strings:
- *
- *      3.0
- *      3.0:3.1
- *      3.0:3.1:3.2
- *      4.0
- *      4.0:4.1
- *
- * Notice how version 4 is completely incompatible with version, and
- * therefore give the breach you can see.
- *
- * There may be other schemes as well that I haven't yet discovered.
- *
- * So, here's the way it works here: first of all, the library version
- * number doesn't need at all to match the overall OpenSSL version.
- * However, it's nice and more understandable if it actually does.
- * The current library version is stored in the macro SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER,
- * which is just a piece of text in the format "M.m.e" (Major, minor, edit).
- * For the sake of Tru64, IRIX, and any other OS that behaves in similar ways,
- * we need to keep a history of version numbers, which is done in the
- * macro SHLIB_VERSION_HISTORY.  The numbers are separated by colons and
- * should only keep the versions that are binary compatible with the current.
- */
 #define SHLIB_VERSION_HISTORY ""
 #define SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER "1.0.0"
 
-
 #endif /* HEADER_OPENSSLV_H */