| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
than defining it for not (i386 and amd64 (and sometimes s390)) only.
Compile-time tests remain compile-time tests, and runtime-test remain
runtime-test instead of being converted to compile-time tests, per matthew@'s
explicit demand (rationale: this makes sure the compiler checks your code even
if you won't run it).
No functional change except on s390 (which we don't run on) and vax (which we
run on, but noone cares about)
ok matthew@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenSSL FIPS module to prevent forbidden digests to be allowed.
No functional change but readability.
ok deraadt@
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
but rather figure out the endianness from <machine/endian.h> automagically;
help from guenther@
ok jca@ guenther@ beck@ and the rest of the `Buena SSL rampage club'
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before someone suggests the OpenSSL people are junkies, here is what they
mention about this:
/* Most will argue that x86_64 is always little-endian. Well,
* yes, but then we have stratus.com who has modified gcc to
* "emulate" big-endian on x86. Is there evidence that they
* [or somebody else] won't do same for x86_64? Naturally no.
* And this line is waiting ready for that brave soul:-) */
So, yes, they are on drugs. But they are not alone, the stratus.com people are,
too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
architectures. ok miod@ djm@
Upstream patch:
commit cdd1acd788020d2c525331da1712ada778f1373c
Author: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Date: Wed Dec 18 21:27:35 2013 +0100
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|