summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/lib/libcrypto/man/OCSP_response_status.3 (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* document OCSP_response_status_str(3)schwarze2019-08-271-4/+19
|
* Tree structure for manual pages: crypto(3) links to 33 functionschwarze2019-06-061-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | group pages, and these link on to all their second-level subpages. Only a handful of second-level pages have third-level subpages. So all crypto pages can now be reached from the www.libressl.org frontpage via at most four clicks, in most cases three clicks. Also link back from leaf pages to their respective group pages and add a couple of additional links between related pages. Triggered by a question from deraadt@. OK jmc@ tb@
* crypto HISTORY up to 0.9.7; researched from OpenSSL gitschwarze2018-03-221-2/+6
|
* Document the additional public function OCSP_basic_sign(3);schwarze2018-02-151-5/+42
| | | | | from David Cooper <david.cooper@nist.gov> via OpenSSL commit cace14b8 Jan 24 11:47:23 2018 -0500.
* Consistently mark up various ASN.1 type names defined in standardsschwarze2016-12-251-7/+17
| | | | related to X.509 with .Vt such that they can be searched for.
* Document OCSP_RESPONSE_new(3), OCSP_RESPONSE_free(3),schwarze2016-12-121-36/+144
| | | | | | | | | | | | OCSP_RESPBYTES_new(3), OCSP_RESPBYTES_free(3), OCSP_BASICRESP_new(3), OCSP_BASICRESP_free(3), OCSP_RESPDATA_new(3), OCSP_RESPDATA_free(3), OCSP_RESPID_new(3), and OCSP_RESPID_free(3), all in <openssl/ocsp.h> and in OpenSSL doc/man3/X509_dup.pod. Note that the OpenSSL documentation specifies the wrong header file. Add some information about what these objects actually represent, along with the pertinent STANDARDS reference. Sort functions into a logical order and apply minor wording tweaks.
* Delete most references to crypto(3). That page isn't useful enoughschwarze2016-12-061-3/+2
| | | | to be pointed to from random individual pages.
* Import OCSP documentation from OpenSSL, leaving out some stuffschwarze2016-11-271-0/+134
that we don't have, fixing some bugs and tweaking some parts for readability. P.S. Why did some people write a HTTP client implementation and then decide that the best place to publish it might be a crypto(3) library? Oh never mind, to go easy on my sanity, i should probably stop asking such questions and just document what i find.