| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has been unused for a long time - it can be found in the attic if
someone wants to clean it up and enable it in the future.
ok tb@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
interfaces, and remove empty assembly OPENSSL_cpuid_setup routines - the
default empty C fallback will work as good.
ok jsing@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
i removed the arithmetics -> arithmetic changes, as i felt they
were not clearly correct
ok tb
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
supposedly smart compilers from optimizing memory cleanups away. Understood.
Ok, in case of an hypothetically super smart compiler, OPENSSL_cleanse() had
to be convoluted enough for the compiler not to recognize that this was
actually bzero() in disguise. Understood.
But then why there had been optimized assembler versions of OPENSSL_cleanse()
is beyond me. Did someone not trust the C obfuscation?
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|